1. IMF World Economic Outlook. Globalization: Opportunities and Challenges, 1997, p. 113.
2. V mezhvoennyj period i do 1950-kh gg. v SShA srednevzveshennyj tamozhennyj tarif na tovary sostavlyal 40-50%.
3. Soglasno dannym Natsional'nogo byuro ehkonomicheskikh issledovanij, v period 1989-2009 gg. pokazateli ehksportnorientirovannykh proizvodstv v SShA byli vyshe sredneotraslevogo pokazatelya bolee chem na 10% po urovnyu zarabotnoj platy i na 30% vyshe po urovnyu proizvoditel'nosti.
4. Bradford S., Grieco P., Hufbauer G. The Payoff to America from Global Integration// The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade. Ed. by Bergsten F. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2005, pp. 65-109.
5. Zdes' i dalee pokazateli torgovli tovarami i uslugami vzyaty s ehlektronnykh resursov The Bureau of Economic Analysis, accessed at URL: http://www.bea.gov/international/factsheet/ (access date 15.09.2016); The US International Trade Commission, accessed at URL: http://dataweb.usitc.gov (access date 15.09.2016); struktura tovarnogo ehksporta i importa – Jackson J. U.S. Trade with Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Partners. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2016, p.13-26.
6. Christopher E. Wilson, Working Together: Economic Ties Between the United States and Mexico. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, November 2011, p. 1-5.
7. Villareal M., Fergusson I. NAFTA at 20: Overview and trade effects. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014, p.24.
8. Ibid., p.16.
9. SShA v srednem predostavlyaet okolo 20 mlrd. doll. v kachestve subsidij kommercheskim i chastnym predpriyatiyam, a takzhe posrednikam v sfere sel'skogo khozyajstva. Should Washington End Agriculture Subsidies? //WSJ, July 12, 2015. Accessed at URL: http://www.wsj.com/articles/shouldwashingtonendagriculturesubsidies1436757020 (access date 21.09.2016).
10. Dogovor vstupil v silu s Sal'vadorom (01.03.2006), Gondurasom (01.04.2006), Nikaragua (01.04.2006), Gvatemaloj (01.07.2006), Dominikanskoj respublikoj (01.03.2007), Kosta-Rikoj (01.01.2009).
11. The Open Door of Trade: The Impressive Benefits of America’s Free Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015, p.4.
12. Jackson J. U.S. Trade with Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Partners. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2016, p.13-26.
13. Economic Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Authorities Procedures. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, 2016, p. 139-144.
14. U.S. Agriculture Benefits from Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014. Accessed at URL: http://www.fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2014-09/us_ag_benefits_from_trade_agreements.pdf (assess date 20.09.2016).
15. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 2016, p. 54-63.
16. Ibid., p.21.
17. Petri P., Plummer M. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2016, p.2.
18. Baughman L., Francois J. Failure to Implement the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: The Cost for American Workers and Companies. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 2009, p.4.
Comments
No posts found